Systems comparison |
The Capito technology
|
||
 |
quite often a little cheaper than the Multi Storage boilers | |
fresh hot water heating – no boiler with stagnant water (safe from Legionella) |
|
lower weight (easier to transport | |
hot water doesn’t have to be heated unnecessary high (energy saving) |
 |
hot water boiler with stagnant water (risk of Legionella) Remedy: constant heating of the hot water at temperatures around 60°C (waste of energy!) | |
longer durability and less harmful substances through a longer running time of the burners (less starts and stops through energy storing technology) |
|
high number of the boilers’ starts and stops through a low buffer water content (high energy costs, more harmful substances) | |
optimal integration of alternative energies(solar technology, wood boiler, heat recovery) |
|
alternative energies (solar technology, wood boiler, heat pump, heat recovery) are only suitable for connection by the use of external storages | |
when installing a solar collector solar energy can be used for hot domestic water and heating |
|
worse heat insulation than the Multi Storage technology | |
integration of a summer line for towel radiators is possible at any time |
|
high residual heat loss during shutdown periods in summer (two separated systems) | |
prepared for prospective energies, change from gas to oil is possible at all times |
|
integration of a summer line for towel radiators isn’t possible | |
lower wattage, because circulation pumps aren’t necessary |
|
change between oil and gas isn’t always possible (dependent on the model) | |
sometimes higher investment costs |
|
more pump current consumption through circulation pumps | |
different way of installation |
|
|
 |
||
